Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 23:59
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What do you think of Andrew Tate?
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Do foreign workers face discrimination in Canada?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Coco Gauff tops Aryna Sabalenka to give the French Open an American champion - The Washington Post
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Brain Adapts to Neuron Loss Through Rapid Rewiring - Neuroscience News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Listen to the eerie sounds of Mars recorded by a NASA rover - Mashable
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Which MacBook should you buy in 2025? - 9to5Mac
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What does it mean if someone asks if it’s pink?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Germany’s Merz ventures into Trump’s lion’s den - politico.eu